He may not consider it a virtue, but I would like to propose to Daniel Morgan that his world view, too, is based on faith.Morgan claimed we should only accept as true things that are “logically consistent and empirically verifiable.” But how do we know the scientific method is a reliable way to discover truth? Logic, perhaps? That answer seems plausible, but how do we know that our system of logic is reliable and true?Morgan seems to answer this question when he states “reason validates itself.” But, if we are seeking to prove the reliability of our system of logic, we cannot use logic to do it. Therefore, Morgan has no reliable way of proving whether the system of logic and the scientific method are true. This faith in logic and reasoning is something he and I share; however, our reasons for sharing it differ. Morgan has placed his faith in logic and the scientific method as his ultimate source of truth, whereas I believe in the reliability and validity of logic and scientific inquiry because I believe they were both created by an infallible God.Amy Wilsonmass communication senior——Contact The Daily Reveille’s opinion staff at [email protected]