The fundamental question is, “why do we need free speech?” None of the states would allow the U.S. Constitution to be ratified without the original 10 amendments, and freedom of speech was included in the first one. Without this right, we would not be able to communicate freely and share ideas.
Free speech is a fundamental concept of our society. Without it, Facebook would approve every wall post and Twitter could easily silence tweets. Students requesting the University approve Free Expression Tunnel postings is the first step towards this end. Although this gives social groups reassurance the University will protect them, this has the potential to silence more than that.
Though the Free Expression Tunnel has evolved into something more meaningful, its original purpose was to combat the University’s trouble with graffiti. The campus is riddled with chalk, but it is temporary, and there are instances of people spray painting other places. The Free Expression Tunnel gives artists and activists the avenue to express themselves without burdening the University.
It could be argued that the Free Expression tunnel is not required for the function of the University, but it is has become a part of the University’s culture and identity. Whether students agree or not, the Free Expression Tunnel is something unique that sets the University apart in terms of freedom. The University gives students space on its property to deface, beautify or use to their own purpose without restraint. Not many students can boast their universities allow that.
Ultimately, the Free Expression Tunnel is a symbolic expression of students. It is a collage of different points of view, varying skill levels and levels of involvement. It is an expression of things that happen on campus. Students asking why we need the Free Expression Tunnel should ask what they want to express, not just in the Free Expression Tunnel.
Students’ asking the University to shut down the Free Expression Tunnel is sad. For the selfish desire of security from opposite points of view, they want it silenced. But shutting it down would be a symbolic blow to free expression of all students, including themselves. Next time theses students walk through the tunnel, they should write what they think, not think to silence what others write.
